REFLECTIONS ON THE NEW GERMANIC MEDICINE
Dr. Hamer, what led you to become interested in cancer, and to question the causal relationships between the soul and diseases?
Until 1978 I had not particularly concerned myself with it. He was an internist, that is, a specialist in internal medicine, and had been working in university clinics (CHU) for 15 years. I ran courses for five years, teaching students. I was a normal internist, I had several years of medical practice under my belt... All that until 1978.
Then something terrible happened. A furious madman fired his rifle, without the slightest reason, at my son Dirk, who was sleeping on a boat. It was an unforeseen blow that caught me completely off guard. A blow against which I felt powerless and without the ability to react. In ordinary life, normal events and conflicts do not cause such a brutal shock to us. We always have the opportunity to prepare a little for them; They are what we would call the ordinary conflicts that we usually have. On the contrary, we call conflicts for which we have no preparation, and which cause a violent psychic disturbance, a shock, biological conflicts.
This is how in 1978 I fell ill due to a biological conflict, a conflict of loss, developing testicular cancer. At that time, since I had never gotten sick with anything serious, it made me think. I thought that, without a doubt, that testicular cancer must be related, in one way or another, to my son's death.
Then, three years later, in a gynecological cancer clinic at the University of Munich where I was head of the internal medicine service, I had the opportunity to investigate whether in my patients at the center the mechanism had developed in exactly the same way as In Myself. That is, if they had also suffered a conflict shock. I discovered that, indeed, in all my patients without exception such a shock event had occurred, as a result of which they had cold hands and experienced weight loss, insomnia, etc. So, by pulling the thread, we could go back to the initial shock from which the cancer must have occurred.
At that time this opinion was so contrary to the official theses of school medicine that as soon as I expressed these ideas to my colleagues I was faced with the dilemma of abandoning my clinical work or retracting it.
It looks like something from the Middle Ages! How did you react to this situation?
Well, when you are a Friesian you cannot abjure, since in the absence of arguments to refute me I would have had to abjure my intimate convictions. Therefore I left. The dismissal produced a biological conflict in me or, more specifically, a violent and brutal devaluation, I remember it very well, since I found it monstrous that I could be kicked out of the clinic solely for having made a well-founded, new and irrefutable scientific discovery. Plus, I never would have imagined that was possible. It was totally dramatic, since until the last day I was able to examine my 200th patient, so that the Iron Law of Cancer almost saw the light in extremis.
Could you briefly and simply explain to us what the essential criteria of the Iron Law of Cancer are?
The Iron Law of Cancer is a biological law. It entails three criteria, the first of which is stated as follows:
• Every cancer or disease analogous to cancer begins with a SDH (Dirk Hamer Syndrome), that is, with a distressing, extremely brutal and dramatic shock, experienced in solitude, which manifests itself almost simultaneously at three levels: psychic, cerebral and organic. .
It is SDH, Dirk Hamer Syndrome. I named it that because the shock caused by the death of my son Dirk was the origin of my testicular cancer. Then this Dirk Hamer Syndrome became the axis, the backbone of the entire New Medicine. Thus, in each case of illness we must try to scrupulously reconstruct the Dirk Hamer Syndrome, with all its agents and consequences.
We must go back to the specific situation at that moment. It is only from that situation that we can understand why the problem has constituted a biological conflict for someone. Why was it so dramatic? Why was the affected person so alone at that time? Why no one had been able to share it with him, and why the problem caused him active conflict. That is, the person in question could not choose between two options offered to him or had no possibility of reacting to the problem.
A good doctor must be able to carry out the identification with equal efficiency with a baby - even an embryo - with an old man, a young woman or an animal, and be able to move to the situation that caused the Dirk Hamer Syndrome. That is the only means you have to be able to distinguish between a problem - of which we have hundreds - and a biological conflict.
The Iron Law of Cancer also has two other criteria, right?
Yes. The second criterion is stated like this:
At the time of Dirk Hamer Syndrome, the form of the conflict determines the brain location of the Hamer Focus, as well as the location in the organ of the cancer or cancer equivalent.
In effect, conflicts do not exist by themselves, but each conflict has a very specific form that is defined at the same moment as the Dirk Hamer Syndrome. The form of conflict is generated through associative means, that is, by instinctive coordination of ideas that generally escapes the filter of our reason.
For example, let's take a typical water or liquid conflict: a tanker loses all its contents in a traffic accident, or a dairy cooperative's car overturns and spills all the milk on the road. An association with water or liquid occurs and, from a biological conflict mentally related to water, a water conflict, a specific type of kidney cancer.
This means that each form of conflict corresponds to a specific cancer, and a specific location in the brain!
Yes. There is a specific relay at the brain level. In our example of kidney cancer due to water or liquid conflict, in the same second that the Dirk Hamer Syndrome occurs, a short circuit occurs in a predetermined location in the brain that, depending on the case, will correspond to the right or left kidney. This short circuit can be photographed with the help of brain scans. The brain area takes on the appearance of concentric circles, like a target or a pond into which a stone has been thrown.
Until now, this phenomenon has always been misinterpreted by radiologists, who diagnosed it as a phenomenon of artificial origin caused by the device itself. The brain location that presents this type of alteration is called Hamer's Focus. It was not I who gave it that name, but my detractors, making fun of those "comical Hamer Spotlights" in the locations discovered by me.
How is the third criterion of the Iron Law of Cancer stated?
The evolution of the conflict corresponds to a specific evolution of the Hamer Focus in the brain, and a specific evolution of a cancer or a disease equivalent to cancer in an organ. It can be summarized like this:
The biological conflict has a triple impact, almost simultaneous, at three levels: psychic, cerebral and organic.
It is easy to conceive and it can also be verified in the first case that presents itself: the evolution of the conflict and, if necessary, of the disease, is synchronous at all three levels. To the extent that the conflict can be resolved, we note that the changes due to this solution occur synchronously, that is, in parallel at the three levels.
It is the action of a predetermined system, in the strictly scientific sense, so that if one of the levels is known, the other two can be deduced cleanly. That is to say, ultimately we have a single organism that we can conceive of at three levels but which in fact is only one.
Here is a small example. In May 1991, after a conference in Austria, near Vienna, a doctor presented me with the brain scan of one of his patients, asking me to explain to his twenty colleagues present - most of them radiologists and brain scan specialists - what I could do. deduce at an organic level and, correlatively, at a psychic level. The information he had was only from one of the three levels: the brain.
From the brain scan I diagnosed a bladder carcinoma in the beginning of bleeding and in the healing phase; an old prostate carcinoma; a diabetes; an old bronchial carcinoma and a sensory paralysis of a specific area of the body, at the same time reporting the corresponding conflicts. Whereupon, the doctor stood up and stated to all of his colleagues: «My most sincere congratulations, Doctor Hamer! The five diagnoses are five hits. It is exactly what the patient has and what he has had. It's fantastic!"
One of the radiologists present then commented: «From today I have been convinced of the well-founded nature of your method. In fact, how else could you predict a carcinoma of the bladder when bleeding begins? "I myself had not found anything remarkable in the brain scan, but now that he has shown us the relays I am willing to immediately confirm his diagnosis."
Let's pause for a moment on the psychic plane. How can I detect that I have suffered a shock of this type, which then triggers the corresponding cancerous disease? How is it recognized?
There are precise criteria that make it easily distinguished from the normal problems and conflicts that we face on a daily basis.
After Dirk Hamer Syndrome, the patient is in a long-lasting state of sympathicotonia, of permanent stress, that is, with completely cold feet and hands, no appetite, losing weight, unable to sleep at night, unable to think about anything else, day and night, than in their conflict. This state only changes when the patient has resolved his conflict.
Thus, unlike normal conflicts and problems, we see that patients who suffer from these biological conflicts maintain permanent stress that presents very specific symptoms, which in addition to the development of cancer and the focus located in the brain, visible from the At first, the patient manifests well-known and defined psychological symptoms that cannot go unnoticed.
What exactly happens when one of these biological conflicts is resolved?
We once again see very manifest symptoms on the psychic, cerebral and organic level. On the psychic level, and at the vegetative level, we see that the patient suddenly stops reflecting day and night on his conflict, recovers his normal sleeping rhythm and gains back the kilos he had lost during the sympathicotonic phase of active conflict. In contrast, he feels down and fatigued, so sometimes he must remain lying down.
This, far from being the beginning of the end, is a very positive symptom. The duration of the healing phase is variable since it depends on the conflict that preceded it and, in general, the patient takes as long as the conflict lasted to recover. At the climax of the healing phase, during which the body has stored a lot of water, we witness an epileptic or epileptoid crisis that manifests itself, depending on each disease, through various symptoms. After this crisis, the body again eliminates water from the edema and slowly returns to normal. In the same way, the patient realizes that he is slowly recovering his strength.
In the course of the healing phase, we simultaneously see on the cerebral level that the Hamer Focus - which during the active phase of the conflict maintained the configuration of a target - becomes edematous, that is, it becomes impregnated with a coloring substance, and that The rings visible by scan disappear, become blurred, while the brain relay becomes completely swollen.
The epileptic or epileptoid crisis mentioned above, and which is in fact triggered by the brain, also marks there the climax of the edema, that is, the point of reflection and return to normality. During the second half of the healing phase, harmless cerebral connective tissue, called neuroglia, begins to flow into the brain with the aim of repairing the Hamer Focus. This connective tissue, totally harmless and which in the brain scan we can color white with an iodide contrast product, has often and mistakenly been mistaken for a brain tumor and removed out of pure foolishness. Indeed, given that after the birth of a human being, brain cells cannot reproduce themselves, it is impossible for true brain tumors to exist.
On the organic level, we now see what until now was considered most important, namely: that cancer does not progress. That is to say, once the conflict is resolved - which we call conflictlysis - the cancer stops and stops proliferating.
This is an extremely important discovery that, so to speak, pre-programs cancer therapeutics. Also on the organic level we also see very specific repair processes that from now on we will examine more precisely. The epileptic crisis also manifests itself at the organic level at the same time that the corresponding phenomena do so at the other two levels.
Could you describe to us what an epileptic seizure really is?
The epileptic crisis is a process that nature has exercised for millions of years. It develops simultaneously at three levels. The meaning and objective of this crisis, which occurs at the climax of the healing phase, is to return to normality. It is what we usually call a ramp attack, with muscular ramps that are a specific form of epileptic seizures, namely the one that is triggered after the solution of a motor conflict.
But epileptoid seizures, that is, similar to epileptic seizures, occur in principle in all types of diseases, although with differences depending on what they are. For this important phenomenon, nature has invented - so to speak - a trick. At the midpoint of the healing phase, the patient experiences a physiological relapse of their conflict, that is, each patient briefly relives their conflict, which at times places them in a stress phase: they have cold hands, generalized cold sweat, and briefly relives all the symptoms of conflictual activity. The objective of all this is to pressure and expel the cerebral edema so that the patient can return to normal. Once the epileptic seizure has ended, the patient's body temperature increases again. This is followed by a small phase of urine loss.
After the epileptic seizure, the patient is fully on the path to normalization, which means that once the seizure is over, nothing that could be frightening or serious will occur again. Towards the end of the healing phase there is a large phase of loss of urinary flow during which the body completely eliminates the rest of the edema.
The moment of danger is immediately at the end of the epileptic or epileptoid crisis, since it is then that it is discovered whether or not the epileptoid crisis has been sufficient to eliminate the steam. The best-known epileptic crisis is myocardial infarction and the best-known list of epileptoid crises is myocardial infarction, and the list of epileptoid crises preferably includes pulmonary embolism, liver crisis or supposed pneumonic crisis. So that in this return to normality the body wins in serious cases, that is, when the conflict has lasted a long time, we help it with a strong injection of cortisone. In very serious cases, cortisone can be administered beforehand.
Could you give us, as an example, some typical conflicts? And what would also be interesting, why are they called biological conflicts?
We call them biological conflicts because they are explained from an ontogenetic point of view, they occur in an analogous way in both man and animal, and they evolve equally in an analogous way in both. They have nothing to do with the problems and conflicts that we usually face (psycho-intellectual conflicts). They are conflicts of a fundamentally different quality, cases of disruption, so to speak, provided by nature in the archaic program of behavior engraved in our brain.
We imagine that we think about it, but in reality the conflict broke out in the interval of seconds through associative means before we had even begun the act of thinking. For example, when a wolf snatches a mother's little sheep, the mother develops a mother-child conflict just as a human mother does. The mother sheep will develop breast cancer on the same side that the human mother develops hers, depending on whether she is right- or left-handed. The brain relay is located in the same location as in the human mother the mother-child behavior relay is located and, in case of disturbance, the Hamer Focus corresponding to the mother-child conflict or the nest conflict. It is the same location where, in the small child's nipple, the relay for child-mother relationships is located.
All our biological conflicts can be classified ontogenetically. Ontogenetically we know when - that is, at what stage of the evolution of the species - specific behaviors have been developed and recorded, so that there are not only correlations between organs and brain areas, but also conflicts that are closely linked ontogenetically. Once again, all related psychic disturbances have neighboring relays in the brain and, ontogenetically speaking, are also neighbors at the organic level, so that they present the same histological cellular formation. It is by learning to consider our organism from an ontogenetic point of view that we discover the prodigious organization of nature.
Could you give us some examples taken from our daily lives?
Yes. Take for example the case of a mother who holds her child by the hand while she is talking to a neighbor on the sidewalk. Suddenly, the child lets go of the mother's hand and runs into the street. Tires screeching, a vehicle that brakes suddenly... and the child who is thrown into the air or is run over. The mother was not prepared for such an event and she was caught completely off guard. She was frozen with fear. The child is taken to the hospital, where he remains perhaps for entire days between life and death. His mother's hands are frozen, she cannot sleep, she has lost her appetite and is in a state of permanent stress. From the moment of the accident, a nodule begins to develop in her left breast (or in her right breast, if she is right-handed). She has suffered a typical mother-child conflict, with a target-shaped configuration in the right cerebellum. When the mother is discharged by the doctors to take her son home, and they tell her: "You were lucky, you came out of this well, there will be no consequences," from that very moment her conflict enters the phase of healing. The conflict has been resolved and from then on the mother's hands are warm again, she can sleep again, she regains weight and has an appetite again. Here is a typical evolution of the conflict, which is almost identical in both man and animal.
Another example could be that of a woman who surprises her husband in bed with her best friend. The woman develops a conflict of sexual frustration that in biological language is a conflict of being-deprived-of-carnal-union-with, and on the organic level it translates into a carcinoma of the cervix if the woman is right-handed.
However, when faced with the same situation, not everyone necessarily reacts in the same way, nor does it necessarily result in the same conflict. In fact, if the woman no longer loved her husband and had been thinking about divorce for a long time, she does not feel this surprise of flagrant crime as a sexual conflict but, at most, as a human conflict of lack of solidarity with the family. This would be a relationship conflict and would cause breast cancer in the right breast, if the woman is right-handed.
From the psychic point of view, the same event, occurring in a different psychic context, is only apparently the same event since in reality it is something totally different. The determining factor is not what happens, but how the patient perceives it psychologically at the time of Dirk Hamer Syndrome. In this case, the same event could trigger a fear-disgust conflict, with hypoglycemia (i.e., decreased blood glucose level) if the woman had surprised her husband in an unpleasant scene with, say, a prostitute. . Or, the same event could trigger a devaluation of oneself - with or without sexual conflict - if the woman had surprised her husband with a girl twenty years younger than her. Then she would have said to herself: "Evidently, I can't compete, I can't offer him that." In such a situation, the affected area of the body would be the skeletal system (the pubic pelvis), where osteolysis would occur, that is, decalcifications, as a sign of sexual devaluation.
It is necessary to know all this to discover what the patient had in his head at the time of the Dirk Hamer Syndrome since it is at that precise moment when he begins to roll on the rail of the disease. This rail is an extremely important image because all the relapses and setbacks that will eventually occur next will again follow the initial layout of the rail. We can therefore speak of a true allergy to conflict.
Doctor Hamer, can patients be treated using the Iron Law of Cancer?
In principle yes. But the Iron Law of Cancer is only the first biological law of the New Medicine. In total there are four biological laws that I have discovered empirically, that is, they are based on the observation of 15.000 similar cases documented so far. If you want to work conscientiously, each case should be verified based on the four biological laws.
Let's look at them one by one. What is the statement of the second biological law discovered by you?
The second biological law of the New Medicine is the law of the two phases of diseases.
Of all diseases?… Not just cancer?
Yes, all diseases in medicine as a whole have two phases. In the past, by ignoring this context, up to a thousand diseases had been roughly listed.
Half were cold diseases, that is, the patient had constricted blood vessels in the skin, was pale and showed weight loss. The rest of the illnesses were hot and presented with fever, dilation of blood vessels, good appetite but a lot of fatigue. All these supposed diseases were considered autonomous conditions. Today we know that all this was a mistake. In all cases they were only half diseases so that currently what we know above are five hundred diseases that present two phases:
The first phase is always the cold phase of active conflict, the sympathicotonic stress phase.
And the second phase, which involves a solution to the conflict, is always a hot phase, of conflict resolution, a vagotonic phase of healing.
In the brain, the Hamer Focus of the two phases are located in the same position, and it can even be said that it is the same Hamer Focus. During the active phase of the conflict the concentric circles in the shape of a target appear clearly delimited. In the healing phase these circles fade into edema. We see with these examples that these biological laws (we will talk about the remaining two together) are valid for all of medicine and not only for cancer.
The old deer, driven from its territory by the young deer, is also in a permanent state of stress, and develops a biological conflict, namely a territory conflict, a little above the right ear. The deer behaves like a condemned man, he only dreams of recovering his territory. He doesn't eat, he doesn't sleep and he loses weight because he is in a state of continuous stress. He suffers from stabbing pain in the heart, angina pectoris, and small ulcers in the coronary arteries at the organic level. And he returns to normal once he manages - precisely because he returns to normal - to expel the intruding rival by reconquering the territory. From that moment on, he enters the phase of permanent vagotonia and returns to eating normally again. He feels overwhelmed by great fatigue, gains weight, and overheats his extremities. At the peak of the healing phase he suffers a myocardial infarction as an epileptic seizure. If you manage to overcome it you can regain possession of your territory.
In the animal kingdom things happen in a similar way as in man. In man his territory will perhaps be his farm, his family or his job, since man has many more partial territories. Even a car can be a territory. In men, a heart attack does not occur unless the conflict has lasted between 3 and 4 months and, normally, if the conflict has lasted more than a year, and if its transition to the vagotonic healing phase has not been detected, it can become in mortal. A brain scan allows for a quick diagnosis. It is surprising that doctors have not discovered this biphasic nature of all diseases for a long time, being something so widespread.
The reason is as easy to see now as it was difficult in the past: it is simply that only part of the conflicts can be solved. If the conflict cannot be resolved, the disease remains in a single phase, that is, the individual remains in his conflict activity. He loses more and more and ends up dying of exhaustion or cachexia. The law of the biphasic nature of diseases is valid only, strictly speaking, in those cases in which the individual can find a solution to his conflict. However, this law is optionally valid for all illnesses and all conflicts since, in principle, all conflicts can be resolved in one way or another.
Doctor Hamer, what is the third of the biological laws discovered by you?
It is the Ontogenetic System of Tumors and Cancer Equivalents.
What does “ontogenetic” mean?
In this context, the term ontogenetic means that in medicine all diseases can be explained by tracing them back to the evolution of the species.
How did you make this discovery?
When I discovered the ontogenetic system of tumors and equivalents, I had already observed a large number of cases, more or less 10.000. And I worked as every conscious scientist should, namely, purely empirically. I systematically documented all cases; I collected the brain scans and the histological results, then I regrouped and compared them, verifying that a shocking result emerged that until then would have been believed impossible: there is a system!
Many patients developed, during the active phase, a compact tumor, that is, cell proliferation. Others, however, developed something during the vagotonic phase, after conflictlysis. And it could hardly be the same thing. There were therefore two types of cell proliferation, namely: a type of cell proliferation in the sympathicotonic phase of conflict activity, and another type of cell proliferation in the healing phase of those diseases that during the phase of conflict activity had led to cellular reduction. (holes, necrosis, ulcers, abscesses).
These diseases therefore presented cellular proliferation in their healing phase, so I began to tirelessly compare these various phenomena. Then, by dint of comparison, I ended up discovering the operating system. I confirmed, in fact, that the tumors that formed during the phase of conflict activity due to cell proliferation always had their relays close to each other in the brain, specifically in the brain stem and cerebellum.
These two parts of the brain together constitute what we call the old brain. Thus, all cancerous diseases that manifested cellular proliferation during the phase of conflict activity had their relays (the point from which they were directed) in the ancient brain.
And all the supposed tumors - which are basically nothing more than an exuberant, surplus form of healing - were, during the active phase of the conflict, holes, ulcers or necrosis, with cerebral relays always located in the brain itself.
The discovery of these systematic correlations marked, in 1987, the birth of the Ontogenetic System of Tumors and Cancer Equivalents which, after the Iron Law of Cancer, and the Biphasic Law of Diseases, constitutes the first systematic classification of the whole of the medicine.
In this context, the term ontogenetic means that neither the location of the Hamer Focus in the brain, nor the type of tumors or necrosis - that is, their histological formation - are coincidence. On the contrary, everything is programmed in a very logical and intelligible way by the history of the transformations that occurred in the individual from fertilization to its perfect constitution, that is, ontogenesis.
It is said that ontogeny is the recapitulation of phylogeny. This means that the evolution of the different species until reaching man is summarized during the embryonic and infantile phase. In embryonic development we know that there are three different embryonic sheets that are formed from the precise moment of development of the embryo, and from which all the organs derive:
the inner embryonic layer, or endoderm,
the middle embryonic layer, or mesoderm, and
the outer embryonic layer, or ectoderm.
Every cell, every organ in the body is linked to one of these sheets.
The cells and organs that have developed from the inner embryonic sheet (endoderm) have their relays, that is, their control bases, in the brain stem, the oldest part of the brain. In the event of cancer development, the organs derived from this embryonic leaf present compact tumors of the adenocyte type.
All the cells and organs that have developed from the external embryonic sheet (ectoderm) have their control relay in the cerebral cortex or telencephalon, the newest part of our brain. In the case of cancer, all of them show cellular reduction in the form of ulcers or functional losses at the organic level, for example, diabetes or paralysis.
Regarding the middle embryonic leaf, we distinguish an older group and a more recent group. The cells and organs that belong to the oldest group of the middle embryonic layer have their relay in the cerebellum, that is, they are part of the old brain and, consequently, in the case of cancer they will develop compact tumors in their phase of conflict activity and, more specifically, of the adenocyte type.
The cells and organs that are part of the newest middle embryonic layer have their control points in the brain marrow, and in the case of cancer, in the active phase of conflict they present necrosis, bone macerations or even cellular reduction. For example, dental cavities, holes in the spleen, kidneys or ovaries, which are respectively called: bone osteolysis, necrosis of the spleen, kidneys or ovaries.
All this shows that cancer is not the absurd fact of cells that proliferate at random but rather a completely understandable and already predictable phenomenon, which follows very precise guidelines according to its ontogenetic data.
If I understand correctly, not all cell proliferations are identical. To have a clearer overview, could you give us an example of these various growths through some diseases?
Yes, and this is the real reason why until now a systematic explanation for the genesis of cancer has not yet been found: its functioning system was simply unknown.
According to the concepts of traditional medicine, which is called academic medicine but which I have renamed school medicine, classifications were made that had absolutely nothing systematic about them. Cancer was diagnosed when cells showed excessive growth. However, as we can currently see, cells can exhibit excessive growth during completely different phases. We thus see that there are cells that can proliferate during the conflict activity phase and cells that can manifest excessive growth during the course of the conflict healing phase.
Take for example a patient who has an indigestion problem, that is, one of which until now he had already swallowed a part but cannot digest completely. He bought a house and suddenly realizes that the purchase contract is not valid, that he has been deceived and that he loses the house. He can, for example, develop stomach carcinoma, that is, an enormous cell proliferation in the stomach, which is what we call stomach adenocarcinoma with cauliflower-shaped growth. He develops this carcinoma during the course of the active phase of the conflict and its corresponding Focus is located in the old brain, on the right side of the brain stem, in what we call the pons.
Another example: a patient has a water conflict, that is, a conflict regarding a liquid, water or anything similar. For example, a young man who is swimming in the Mediterranean is exhausted and is about to drown but at the last second he is saved and revived. From that moment on he dreams for months that he drowns and firmly decides not to get into the water again. During this time he develops a necrotic cancer of the renal parenchyma, that is, cellular reduction with necrosis occurs in the spongy tissue of the kidney until finally all the renal tissue is exhausted and the kidney becomes non-functional. Years later the conflict is finally resolved because the patient's little daughter wanted to kick in the water, and the patient decided for the first time to go spend his vacation at sea. During the healing phase, a thick kidney cyst or cell proliferation is formed that solidifies and hardens through a type of connective tissue and whose final purpose is to reconvert into kidney tissue and eliminate urine.
In general, we came to wonder what the purpose and reason for tumors were, or perhaps even, what their current meaning was. In fact, cancers and tumors were not devoid of meaning, of purpose, but on the contrary, they were something very judicious. Take for example the morsel that is already in the stomach and has therefore been swallowed but cannot be digested because it is too large. To solve this situation the body develops a huge tumor. But this tumor is not something absurd, senseless, it is digestive cells, intestinal cells that produce enormous quantities of digestive juice, and that convert the swallowed morsel into something digestible so that in the animal kingdom this piece can be digested and continue its life. course. In the same way we have seen that at the origin of the cysts there was the purpose of rebuilding a large piece of kidney capable of eliminating urine.
Here then is the meaning of the various tumors of cellular growth that in the past we were not able to discern, but that today we can differentiate and specify in their triple cerebral, histological and conflictual plane. All these correlations are summarized in the ontogenetic system of tumors and cancer equivalents since all the diseases that we know in medicine develop in accordance with these four biological laws, respond to them point by point and remarkably verify the ontogenetic system of tumors and equivalents. of cancer. At the psychic and cerebral level, all the symptoms in the same phase are identical, they only differ at the level of the organ. At this level, each organ with a control relay in the old brain causes cell proliferation in the conflict activity phase, while the organs directed by the telencephalon present, in their conflict active phase, holes, necrosis, ulcers, etc. That is, cellular reductions. During the healing phase everything happens in reverse: the organs governed by the old brain shrink their tumors with the help of specialized microbes while during that same healing phase, the holes and ulcers in the organs governed by the telencephalon are filled again with the help of viruses and bacteria, increasing the volume of the affected area through swelling.
Here then is the fourth Law!
Indeed, the Ontogenetic System of Microbes.
In this context we hear a lot about the immune system. So tell us, Doctor Hamer, what role do microbes play in your system?
Until now we only conceived of microbes from the perspective of infectious diseases, for which they were held responsible. This way of seeing things seemed obvious since microbes were always found in all infectious diseases. Well, that's not true. In the same way that the global immune system is nothing more than a mirage... built on hypotheses. In diseases considered infectious we had forgotten or neglected their first phase.
These diseases, supposedly infectious, were always preceded by a phase of conflict activity and it is only once the conflict has been resolved that the microbes can come into action. And of course, they are activated and directed by our brain. Far from being our enemies, they are our auxiliaries in the sense that they carry away the debris of the after-effects of cancer once the tumor, having fulfilled its mission, is no longer useful. Or it is bacteria and viruses that help by filling in holes and repairing damage caused by necrosis and tissue destruction in the other group, the group governed by the telencephalon. They are therefore, from beginning to end, our faithful helpers, our despised workers. The idea of the immune system (an army fighting against the invasion of villainous microbes) is absolutely false.
In this context, tuberculosis comes to mind. Specifically, pulmonary tuberculosis. So what was it about people who only half a century ago did health treatments to cure their pulmonary tuberculosis?
Leaving aside pleural tuberculosis, and limiting ourselves to pulmonary tuberculosis itself, we can affirm that this is in fact the healing phase after a preliminary cancer of round spots in the lung. This cancer with round spots in the lung always has the fear of dying as its conflict and is always governed by the brain stem.
Consequently, during the active phase of the conflict it increases in size, while during the healing phase it is reduced thanks to mycobacteria (tuberculosis bacteria) to the extent that these are present, caseified and often expectorated in sputum. bloody and leaving behind caverns that give the lung a significantly greater respiratory capacity than it previously had while it was filled with compact cancers in the form of round spots.
For this reason, if the tuberculosis mycobacteria are missing during the healing phase, the round spots remain. Today we can still often see, after several decades, those old round spots in the lung, no longer able to grow but which have not been deactivated. Instead, and at the time when tuberculosis mycobacteria were omnipresent, we saw caverns, that is, hollowed-out round spots.
Dr. Hamer, we could now focus on practical conflict therapy. Is it, in principle, a therapy that is developed through dialogue?
Just talking, no. We have no need for this dialogue therapy as it was formerly used by psychotherapy, in which we had to talk together about no matter what problem. It must be talked about, of course, but it is best to refer back to the animal kingdom. In effect, the animal cannot survive, it cannot resolve its conflict if it is not with a real solution. The deer, for example, will only survive if it reconquers its territory. The mother, from whom the predator snatches the child, will only survive if she forces him to release the cub from her, chasing him, or - this is something that nature has foreseen - if the mother quickly becomes pregnant again. Then the conflict is truly resolved.
To tell the truth, this is how we should also proceed in our human relationships, trying to find from the beginning a real solution to the conflict, that is, to resolve it in a practical way. The deer needs to recover its territory or conquer another. The practical solution is the best and most durable: it is the definitive solution.
Only when this solution proves impracticable can we try therapy through dialogue to, let's say, have a replacement solution as a way out, as an escape. Here we must also point out that the therapy applied until now in all psychic difficulties has been to calm down, disconnect, take tranquilizers, the important thing being to calm down.
In reality, if nature has programmed a stress it is not without reason, since it is only under stress that the individual can resolve the conflict. To find a real solution, far from suppressing stress, it is necessary, on the contrary, to accentuate it even more to put the individual in a position to resolve it. If tranquilizers were administered to the deer, it would never be able to recover its territory, since its activity would be paralyzed. It can be seen then that, in psychiatry, administering tranquilizers - that is, chemicals - to calm patients, the only thing that is achieved is to cultivate chronic diseases, since these patients, deprived of their own natural means to resolve conflicts, They have no wind left in their sails. In this way, these unfortunate people will never be able to solve their problems, and are often condemned to spend their entire lives behind the bars of psychiatry.
Doctor Hamer, how to conceive, in a concrete way, a therapy based on the four biological laws discovered by you?
We must assimilate that the patient has these three imaginary levels: the psychic, the cerebral and the organic plane, although in fact the set of the three constitutes a single organism. Therapy must therefore be developed at these three imaginary levels, or extended to them.
We must verify whether the patient is right- or left-handed, in order to find out which is his predominant cerebral hemisphere and which he uses primarily.
In addition, it is important to verify the current hormonal situation, specifying whether, for example, a patient is in the phase of sexual maturity, if she is pregnant or if she is taking the pill (which blocks hormonal production). The same applies - with the appropriate changes - to man. In fact, due to hormonal modifications, hemispheric predominance may change sides, since a woman who takes the pill normally reacts with a male territory conflict if her partner leaves her or leaves home.
It is not enough to find the conflict on the psychic level, we must also be able to locate it exactly in the brain, depending on the conflict phase that we find at the time of the anamnesis and examination of the patient.
And, naturally, it is necessary that this conflict, this cancerous disease in the organ, always corresponds unambiguously with the cerebral Hamer Focus, that is, that to each determined location in the brain there always corresponds a cancerous disease in an organ as well. determined from the body and vice versa.
We have already said that the conflict must be resolved from the psyche, and that it is best to find the real solution, because the basis of the conflict is a real problem. Whenever possible, the mother's sick child - the one who had an accident - should be cured and restored. A man who has lost his job and who, as a consequence, has a territory conflict, must find another job or create a new territory by joining a club, an association, retire or dedicate himself to a hobby.
For every conflict there are multiple possible solutions. Many of them are already programmed by nature. For example, in the past predators ate many lambs. The sheep solved the conflict by getting pregnant as quickly as possible and bringing lambs to the new world. In humans, and in general, all types of conflict stop at the third month of gestation, and no cancer can continue to develop because pregnancy has absolute priority.
At the cerebral level, most complications appear during the healing phase when, as a sign of healing, local cerebral edema appears, presenting cranial (intracranial) hypertension, and it is necessary to monitor the patient so that he does not go into a coma. During this phase, and in the mildest cases, coffee, tea, grape sugar (glucose), vitamin C, Coca Cola and a bag of ice on the head are - as in ancient times - more than enough. In severe cases the choice of remedy currently falls on cortisone due to its slowing action. Cortisone is not a remedy against cancer but rather a purely symptomatic means against cerebral edema as well as against all organic edemas of the healing phase such as bone edemas caused by inflammation of the periosteum.
In serious cases, and as a general rule, it is worth remembering the following:
absorb little liquid;
keep your head elevated;
avoid direct exposure to the sun and, in case of lateral cerebral edema,
Avoid as much as possible tilting the head towards the side of the cerebral edema.
At the organic level, the only therapy that was contemplated until now was to suppress the tumor - or what was believed to be a tumor -, without trying to find out if it had developed during the active phase of the conflict or if it was a proliferation developed over the course of the healing phase. They extirpated each other indifferently. This organic level is presented to us today in a completely different perspective. When the conflict has been resolved, the tumor should not be operated on or removed except in very rare and exceptional cases.
Proliferating tumors in the healing phase - which is the correct way to define them - rarely need to be operated on. Only in those cases in which they cause significant mechanical discomfort or limit the patient's movements, as happens for example with a large kidney cyst, or a large spleen resulting, during the healing phase, from preliminary necrosis. (Necrosis of the spleen occurs in the organic substrate in a conflict of bleeding and wound, with a fall of thrombocytes in the phase of conflict activity, and as splenomegaly, that is, increase in the volume of the spleen, in the healing phase).
Under the prism of the New Medicine, a total rethinking is necessary and questioning each time about what should be done, what is prudent or not to do. In fact, if we leave the patient the choice of whether or not he wants to have surgery for a small intestinal tumor, the patient knowing that the conflict that generated it has already been definitively resolved and that, consequently, this tumor, according to a degree of probabilities bordering on certainty, it will not continue its development, it is evident that in 99,9% of cases the patient will respond: «Doctor, let's leave the tumor as it is. "It doesn't bother me and it won't bother me again in the 30-40 years that I still have left in my life."
Doctor Hamer, could you explain to us why this Cancer Law is called the Iron Law?
Because like iron it is unalterable. And it is a biological law in the same way that it is a biological law that a child always has a father and a mother, since the participation of both is required to generate a new being. This is how in the New Medicine we have four biological laws that are almost iron. The second is the Law of Two Phases of Diseases. The third is the Ontogenetic System of Tumors and Cancer Equivalents. And the fourth is the Ontogenetically conditioned System of Microbes.
All of these laws are iron, just like the Iron Law of Cancer, and all of them are, in the strictly scientific sense of the term, reproducible, that is, they can be controlled and verified from the first case that is presented to us. Saying that you have a biological law simply means that you have a rule that states how and according to what law something takes place. It does not detail what has been programmed. It is according to these same mathematical rules that debits and credits are calculated. What is decisive is what the body has programmed. If you have programmed the resolution of the conflict, that is, if the conflict is resolved, then the therapy develops almost automatically. If the solution to the conflict cannot be programmed and it remains unresolved, then, by virtue of these same laws, the individual dies. This is why these laws are called Biological Iron Laws.
Dr. Hamer, what role does the time factor play in this context, particularly with regard to the complications that will have to be faced during the healing phase?
Naturally, the patient asks his doctor: "About how long will it take until I am cured of my illness?"
As long as we have done our job well, locating the Dirk Hamer Syndrome and the moment in which the conflict has been resolved, we can calculate the duration of the conflict. Provided we have taken a good anamnesis, we will have been able to discern the intensity of the conflict. And depending on the duration and intensity of the conflict, we are able to evaluate the mass of the conflict.
It is normally a fact that in 90% of cases no notable complications occur in the healing phase. The remaining 10% remains. In cases in which the conflict has lasted longer or the intensity has been considerable (or both at the same time), the patient presents a significant mass of conflict that, once resolved, can create complications in the form of cerebral edema and, especially, epileptic or epileptoid seizures. We must be aware of these complications, which, on the other hand, are only feared in 10% of cases in which, when the time comes, they can lead to death.
The most important thing is, however, that despite all these complications, the patient today has a new approach to his illness through which he knows that his doctor is perfectly aware of the overall development of this - active phase and phase of solution of the conflict -, and who is capable of controlling and dominating the situation. As a result, the patient truly trusts his doctor, and rightly so.
Now, thanks to the New Medicine, we can knowingly practice well-directed therapy, something that was not possible previously and from the perspective of academic medicine. Thanks to this global knowledge of medicine, the patient never falls into a state of panic. Or at least, he is as scared as when his doctor previously diagnosed him with purulent angina. And yet, what was purulent angina? Answer: the healing phase following adenocarcinoma of the tonsils.
Increasingly, doctors are performing exploratory excisions and informing patients - which is correct - that they have tonsillar carcinoma. What happens next is that the patient, who knows nothing about the New Medicine, goes into a state of panic. This panic can generate new conflict shocks such as the fear of cancer and the terror of death, which trigger a new cancer. The first medical diagnosis is thus, apparently, brilliantly confirmed.
What happens in animals?
In the animal kingdom, supposed metastases are practically never seen to appear. An Austrian professor from Klagenfurt has found an original formula that explains this phenomenon: «Hamer takes us all for idiots. He says that the animals are lucky because they do not understand the voice of the chief doctors, which explains why they do not develop metastases.
According to you, then, metastases do not exist?
Without any kind of detour I answer NO. What the ignorant academics took as metastases are new cancers triggered by new conflictual shocks that are completely iatrogenic, that is, shocks caused by medical diagnoses and prognoses.
This fable of metastases was based on unproven and unprovable hypotheses. No researcher has yet been able to find a single cancer cell in the arterial blood of a cancer patient. And that is where they should be located, if they swim towards the periphery, that is, towards the outer regions of the body. It is on this fable, completely hypothetical, that the thesis is based that cancer cells during their migration - still never observed through the blood - would have even metamorphosed along the way so that, for example, a cancer cell of the intestine (which produces a compact cauliflower-shaped tumor inside the intestine) would suddenly begin to migrate towards the bones where it will be able to metamorphose into necrosis. This is an aberrant hypothesis worthy of medieval dogmatism.
The ontogenetic system definitively demonstrates that it is impossible for a cell governed by the old brain, and that develops compact tumors, to suddenly leave the brain points that govern it, relate to the telencephalon and produce necrosis. It can be admitted that almost 80% of second and third cancers have been caused by the foolish machinery of ignorant people who are still at the stage of medical schoolchildren.
Dr. Hamer, what role do so-called carcinogenic substances play in the genesis of cancer? Do you think healthy nutrition can stop or slow cancer?
There are no carcinogenic substances. Countless vivisection experiments have been carried out on animals and yet it has not yet been possible to really prove that a carcinogenic substance has been found. Of course, the tests that have been carried out have been completely idiotic, since for a year concentrated doses of formaldehyde have been injected into the noses of rats, which these poor beasts normally avoid as a virulent poison, making great detours. In the end the rats developed cancer of the nasal mucosa. In fact, the cancer was not due to formic aldehyde or formalin, but since these poor rats have a horror of this product, which is their bête noire, they have developed a nasal mucosa conflict, therefore a Dirk Hamer Syndrome, a conflict biological of not wanting to smell, we could say.
Furthermore, it is known that it is not possible to produce cancers in organs whose nerve connections to the brain have been cut. Despite this, research has been carried out on almost 1.500 supposedly carcinogenic substances, which owe only their label as a carcinogen to the senseless regulations imposed by vivisection. By this I do not mean that all these substances are harmless to us, only that they do not cause cancer or, at least, that they do not produce it without the intervention of the brain. In fact, until now it was accepted that cancer was the result of organic cells that were triggered by chance.
All these speculations regarding the carcinogenic role of tobacco, the carcinogenic power of aniline or other products, are just pure hypotheses that have never been proven and are unprovable. On the contrary, it has been observed that the 6.000 hamsters exposed to cigarette smoke had lived an average longer than their 6.000 conspecifics that had not been smoked for 6 years. The fact that they missed was that goldhamsters are not at all afraid of smoke for the simple reason that they live underground. This is why that code, that smoke alarm signal, is not registered in their brain.
The opposite happens in house mice, at the slightest emanation of smoke they go into a terrible panic and flee. When in the Middle Ages you saw a multitude of mice fleeing from a house, you could be sure that in one corner or another there was a fire. Therefore, a certain number of these mice can be given cancer - in the form of round spots in the lung -, which corresponds to a conflict of fear of death.
These two examples are enough to explain and make it understood that all the experiments currently carried out on animals are nothing more than absurd cruelty towards them, given that in all of them it is presumed that the soul of the animal does not exist. In short, there is no proof that there are carcinogenic substances that act on an organ, without the intervention of the brain.
And as for the radioactive effects?
Exposure to radioactive radiation, such as that released in the Chernobyl nuclear accident, indiscriminately destroys the cells of the body, however, the germ cells (gametes) and bone cells are the most damaged, since it is these cells that Nature has endowed with a higher division rate.
When the bone marrow - where blood is made - is damaged and begins to heal, we witness a leukemia that, in principle, is the same leukemia that occurs during the healing phase following a bone cancer triggered by a devaluation of oneself. same. Therefore, and strictly speaking, we must say that the blood symptoms of leukemia are non-specific, that is, they do not manifest only in cancer but in any healing of the bone marrow. The fact that there are hardly any leukemic survivors of their disease is solely due to the ignorance of schoolchildren's medicine, whose treatment with chemo and radiotherapy destroys what was still left of the bone marrow, that is, it does just the opposite of what should have been done. In conclusion, radioactivity is harmful, it destroys cells, but it does not cause cancer because it can only be triggered from the brain.
And healthy eating?
Thinking that healthy eating can prevent cancer is also absurd. Naturally, an individual - man or animal - who eats a healthy diet is less subject or receptive to all types of conflicts, in the same way that it is evident that a rich person develops ten times fewer cancers than a poor person because they manage to resolve a greater number of conflicts. conflicts with a well-filled portfolio.
For the same reason, a strong and robust animal catches fewer cancers than a sick and old animal. It is something undeniable that it is in the nature of things, which does not mean, however, that old age is carcinogenic. What happens to the older animal is that it is simply weaker. The older deer is less strong and is therefore easily driven out of its territory by a younger deer that is full of strength.
Doctor Hamer, in traditional medicine pain is considered a negative sign. What role does pain play in the New Medicine?
Well yes, pain is a particularly difficult chapter. There are different qualities of pain. There are pains in the active phase of the conflict, such as angina pectoris or stomach ulcer. And there is another group: the pain that exists during the healing phase, which is caused by inflammation, swelling or edema, or even by scarring.
The pains of the active phase of the conflict, such as those of angina, disappear immediately after the conflict has been resolved. They are pains that, if desired, can be resolved psychically.
On the contrary, the pains of the healing phase, which, in principle, are something positive, cannot be effectively combated unless the patient understands the relationships of cause and effect, preparing and adapting to them as to a really important job that It Must be done. Naturally, there are ways to alleviate the patient's pain, either through medications or algaecides for external use.
In both man and animal, pain fundamentally has a biological meaning: that of completely immobilizing the organism and the organ, so that healing can be carried out optimally. This is how it happens in healing bone cancer. The extension of the periosteum (the connective membrane that covers the bone) causes severe pain during the healing phase. Or, for example, the tension of the liver capsule, which is painful during the swelling of the liver in the healing phase of hepatitis. Mention should also be made of scar pain during the late healing phase, for example, during the thickening of the pleural effusion after pleural cancer, or the thickening of the ascites, which constitutes the healing phase of a cancer of the peritoneum. .
The terrible thing is that in current medicine all patients who have cancer and pain, even if they are slight, immediately receive morphine or morphine derivatives. Even a single injection can be fatal, since it frighteningly modifies the overall oscillation of the brain and completely demoralizes the patient. From that moment on, the intestine is also paralyzed and can no longer process and assimilate food. The patient develops abulimia and does not realize that he is about to be killed when he was already in the healing phase, and that if only nature were allowed to take its course he would regain health in the space of a few weeks.
Telling a prisoner that he is going to be executed in two weeks awakens a great wave of compassion, even if he is one of the worst criminals. But if you tell a patient that he is going to be executed through morphine injections and that it will last fifteen days, he will surely prefer to endure the pain rather than let himself be killed.
When patients look back on the relatively short time the pain has lasted, they are grateful that they were spared death from morphine, to which they would most certainly have succumbed in their healing phase, after two or three weeks. receive morphine, Fortral, Valoron or Temgesic.
But don't doctors know this? they ask incredulously. Of course the doctors know it! They armor themselves behind the dogmatic and comfortable point of view that pain is the beginning of the end and that, in any case, nothing can be done. So let's start by shortening the process. The natural cure of cancer is simply ignored for dogmatic reasons so that cancer continues to be... a disease from which one necessarily dies and through which the patient continues to be manipulated.
How would you summarize the essence of the New Medicine, most importantly, its central axis?
The New Medicine represents a complete turnaround from the hypothesis medicine practiced until now. School medicine needs between five hundred and a thousand hypotheses and a few thousand additional hypotheses so that, except for a hodgepodge of crazy facts, it knows nothing at all and does nothing but work on the basis of statistics.
For the first time in medicine as a whole, the New Medicine knows according to which biological laws all diseases develop. And he knows that deep down they are not real diseases but that these phases of active conflict are necessary, that they are there to help resolve a conflict that we had in the framework of nature and that, deep down, conflict is something for us. Well. It is the first time that it is possible for us to really have a synoptic vision, as a whole, of our diseases. On a psychic level, on the cerebral level and on the organic level, based on the four biological laws. And for the first time in a long time, medicine is once again an art, an art for the doctor who has good sense and warm hands. The New Medicine can no longer be stopped. Nor the new way of thinking that emerges from it, the end of the worst form of existing slavery: total alienation from oneself.
The fear resulting from the loss of natural confidence in ourselves and our body; abandoning the instinctive listening of our organism, they lose their footing and begin to stagger. And, understanding the cause and effect relationships between the psyche and the body, the patient also grasps the mechanism of fear, the irrational panic triggered by the forecast of dangers - supposedly inevitable - which from now on are only inevitable and mortal. to the extent that the patient believes it and is afraid.
The immense power of doctors is also ending, engendered by the fear of the alleged self-destructive mechanism of cancer, by the fear of the supposed uncontrolled growth of metastases that consume life, etc. The responsibility that doctors have never assumed or been able to assume will now have to be returned to the patients themselves. This New Medicine can only mean authentic freedom for those who have truly understood it.
Finally, Dr. Hamer, can you explain to us what the original title of your book Vermächtnis einer neuer Medizin means, that is, Legacy of a New Medicine?
I consider the discovery of the New Medicine to be the legacy of my son Dirk, whose death caused my testicular cancer. I administer this legacy to transmit it faithfully and conscientiously to all patients, so that with the help of this New Medicine they are enabled to understand his illness and that, having understood it, they can overcome it, thus recovering their health.
Translated from the publication “INTERVIEW AU DR. HAMER.”
ASAC
BP 134
